Online Advertising Rules
Microsoft’s acquisition last week of aQuantive for $6 billion in cash shows the lengths that technology companies will go to muscle into the online advertising market. Microsoft paid a substantial premium at $66.50 per share, compared with aQuantive’s closing price on Thursday of $35.87 per share. The deal follows on the heels of Google’s $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick Inc. in April. A pair of recent US decisions considered the law relating to search engines and online advertising:
In Site Pro-1, Inc. v. Better Metal, LLC (E.D.N.Y. May 9, 2007), the court decided that keyword triggering and metatag usage in online advertising does not qualify as trademark use and therefore cannot constitute infringement. For the court, the question was whether the trademark was placed visibly on any goods, displays, containers, or advertisements – if the trademark was not displayed to consumers, no infringement could take place. This analysis differs from decisions elsewhere in the US, so the debate continues.Â
In Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (9th Cir. May 16, 2007), the Court of Appeal decided that Google’s display of thumbnail images in search results should be considered “fair use” and therefore did not constitute copyright infringement. While this decision is generally considered good for search engines, the court also left open the question of contributory infringement, and when search engines can take advantage of the defences available under the DMCA .
Â
Calgary – 11:45 MST
1 comment
[…] If you link there now, you’ll find the standard warning that “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by MLB Advanced Media.“ It was taken down after a complaint by the copyright owner. In other words, the Court of Appeals has encouraged readers to access infringing content, something warned about in the Perfect 10 case. Applying the analysis regarding contributory infringement, did the Court know of infringing activities and fail to take “reasonable and feasible steps” to refrain from providing access to infringing content? If so, they might be liable for contributory infringement! […]